Low interest environment with fixed liabilities, people living longer etc. not a great investment thesis.
Can you explain why a longer average lifespan and a low yield environment make it less likely that people will want security of income in their retirement (as that is what you seem to imply)?
Further political risk if annuity income is calculated at 100% instead of 60%.
Sure, but that only affects lifetime income streams (which are still a small proportion of CGF’s annuity mix). Also, the main effect of the income/asset test is to influence whether a prospective annuitant will want to choose a product with or without access to capital, not so much whether an annuity makes sense for them in the first place.
You can find an exhaustive explanation of the issue in the link below:
Cheers
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CGF
- News: CGF Challenger Ltd To Commence U.S. Dollar Annuity Reinsurance
News: CGF Challenger Ltd To Commence U.S. Dollar Annuity Reinsurance, page-64
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CGF (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$6.46 |
Change
0.085(1.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.457B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$6.40 | $6.49 | $6.40 | $4.116M | 638.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
19 | 7629 | $6.45 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$6.46 | 1691 | 12 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
14 | 7045 | 6.450 |
13 | 18392 | 6.440 |
12 | 27007 | 6.430 |
6 | 4740 | 6.420 |
4 | 75398 | 6.410 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
6.460 | 7594 | 12 |
6.470 | 11401 | 13 |
6.480 | 26113 | 24 |
6.490 | 39498 | 18 |
6.500 | 28930 | 19 |
Last trade - 11.46am 16/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CGF (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online