Selling goods below cost
While selling goods at a below-cost price is usually okay, it may be illegal if it is done for the purpose of eliminating or substantially damaging a competitor. This is known as predatory pricing. Whether the law has been broken will depend on a number of factors, such as how long the goods were sold below cost and how much market power the seller has.
Your kidding right?! VAH eliminating or substantially damaging QANTAS? Try the other any around. QANTAS should be done for predatory pricing by your fallacious arguement.
QANTAS had the resources and the motive to carry out such a practice. In fact they did with the “65% market share line in the sand” the Joyce quoted. It resulted in such a capacity oversupply war it hurt VAH more than QANTAS.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- VAH
- news.com.au reporting voluntary admin
news.com.au reporting voluntary admin, page-15
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 125 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add VAH (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online