A term sheet is NOT legally binding. The agreement that follows it (if there is one) is legally binding.
In this case no legally binding final agreement was reached.
IMO this just shows how desperate Tesla is to get lithium. Could they be hoping to deep pocket CXO to seal an agreement giving them lithium at a cheap price?
my opinion
DYOR
A term sheet is NOT legally binding. The agreement that follows...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 94 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CXO (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
9.0¢ |
Change
-0.004(4.26%) |
Mkt cap ! $196.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 9.4¢ | 9.4¢ | 9.0¢ | $579.3K | 6.298M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 82 | 3501160 | 9.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 9.1¢ | 625147 | 19 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.44am 30/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CXO (ASX) Chart |