Not at fault. Period. Facts of the case are pretty clear to me.
Shine tried to exaggerate that it took EML 4 days to request trading halt. But the 4 days included 2 non-trading days and one morning before trading day, effectively one day. That one day was due to time difference, seeking legal advice.
This letter wasn’t made known to the whole company, only senior managers and one executive director.
Shine needs to prove culpability for negligence of management in the timely release of information, and the safeguarding of information to the entire company.
In my view both arguments are weak. If the court does rule against EML, perhaps ASX is going to lose its attractiveness as a listing destination.
Not at fault. Period. Facts of the case are pretty clear to me....
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add EML (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
93.0¢ |
Change
0.010(1.09%) |
Mkt cap ! $348.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 92.5¢ | 94.0¢ | 90.8¢ | $885.4K | 954.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 385011 | 93.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 94.0¢ | 5047 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EML (ASX) Chart |