Agree it is debatable. Derivative action is not by an aggrieved party, but by shareholders where the claim is directors have failed in their duty. The action is on behalf of the company. So if DCN did a deal with GCN to process ore when a better plan would have been to process Kin ore temporarily then restart mining DCN ore there could be grounds, depending on the facts. If processing GMD ore is not the best option for DCN then GMD would have a problem imho. Directors who voted for a lesser plan in order to help GMD out could be vulnerable. But it wouldn’t be me taking them to court. Delphi could afford to, if so inclined.
Agree it is debatable. Derivative action is not by an aggrieved...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add GMD (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.76 |
Change
0.025(1.45%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.968B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.74 | $1.78 | $1.72 | $6.123M | 3.494M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 101629 | $1.76 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.77 | 28417 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| GMD (ASX) Chart |