JSS-2107: The content of your reply is, of course, irrelevant in total.
Metallurgical test results have nothing to do with exploration activity - which is the major driver of the market status of this stock.
The maiden resource ann of the 7th July is backward, not forward looking in terms of exploration. It interprets past results.
The only previously unreported drilling assay results in this quarter total that for 12.1 metres (07/07/20). Not spectacular! In that same ann the statement is made: "Further results are expected from ongoing drilling in coming weeks"; Fig 3, p5. Forthcoming = zero.
There are now 19 days left in this quarter. With no news in that time it is going to be a very brief quarterly report - other than some executive high fives about how "we sucked $135M out of the market" and "a new portal for u/g mining was commenced".
I refer you to the first ann about Government Well. The news of 17m @ 4.2g/t was released on the 10th June. It appeared in a presentation doc (Macquarie M & E Forum) released in an ann 24 hours later on the 11th June. There has been nothing since despite "pending assays" - a 3 months hiatus. This is playing games and manipulating news releases - and not acceptable.
You do misinterpret my objectives in posting on this subject. I am a solid believer in BGL's prospects and have been for almost 2 years during which time there have many swings. My investment is substantial. I consider that that gives me some latitude in expressing a disappointment in management's recent performance. It would seem that the performance so far today indicates that others also have this view.
BGL Price at posting:
$1.02 Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)