Same feeling here, LCK should still have $15m+ AUD in the bank ($11m+ if they are reckless), supply/demand looks good for the business, not rocket science but 100+ years of proven chemistry, every capital investment is off-the-shelf, the upsides are literally too many to count
why agree to such funding terms!!??? If they shop around in S. Korea (even Japan), I'm sure they can find a much better partner with much, much better terms.
I've been through placements of this kind of terms twice, both ended in a disaster lasting longer than 24+ months (85%+ paper loss was not uncommon for me during those agonising 24 months).
With all the liquidity in the world, why is there even an appetite for this!?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- News: LCK Leigh Creek Energy Says To Raise Up To A$20 Mln Via Placement
Same feeling here, LCK should still have $15m+ AUD in the bank...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 57 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NRZ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
1.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $24.73M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
NRZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable