Prove it?
Gomspace said themselves the $1.9m was for amounts owing in relation to batch 1. Now unless each batch only costs $1.9m, one can very very safely assume that this is a downpayment on construction. We all know the first batch is not complete yet as Gomspace halted all work on them due to non-payment of CDR & the $1.9m.
So yes, this would no doubt be a downpayment. Which is consistent with what I've been saying all along, SAS has to pay a portion of the total batch construction cost in advance, something like 20-40% at the start and 60-80% on completion and delivery.
Are your rose tinted glasses that thick that you actually think that a batch of 16 nano-sats only costs $1.9m?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SAS
- News & Media
News & Media, page-2124
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,106 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
FWD
Queensland's housing crisis an opportunity for ASX builder Fleetwood – and taxpayer cash a safe harbour from the storm
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug