News & Media, page-2254

hi vig
and thanks for being part of the sas journey
maybe you should have realised when you invested in sas that it is a startup...and unlike most startups the industry is new...hence the number of world firsts....hence it constellation platform is unique.
clearly you didnt do your research in that regard.
considering how successful the testing of the diamonds has been the progress of the diamonds has been remarkable.
not only that but the diamonds have been used to provide testing verification for potential customers hence the many mou signed which will bring significant revenue once the pearl constellation is up....that is obviously a much better explanation of the pearls revenue or lack of it than your repeated low brow efforts.
further you have been pretty low brow in your efforts regarding capitol raising...considering it is a startup cost overruns are to be expected as there are no existing models.
worse than that when you are held to account for you lack of research and hence your repeated innane comments you resort to name calling and false information.
just to add regarding testing.....as you dont read announcements this may clarify some things for you ....not only have sas introduced new communications infrastructure based on space proven, nano-satellites technology but they will do it with up to 80% savings vs conventional satellites via a network of low cost nano-satellites with reduced capital expenditure, launch and operating costs.they have established IP developed for a complex and sophisticated software system – combining unique expertise in space technology and network management and achieved a number of firsts for nano-sats,including first: intersatellite communication,data transfer, voice call, financial transaction, and cybersecurity integration.it is proving to be a remarkable story.
disassociating the diamonds testing from the pearls can only be attributed to the confusion with the names...which is unfortunate.
as always
dyor
always read announcements
dont blame others for your own poor/ lack of research
dont misquote the disclaimer
and dont make stuff up