Do you think it is reasonable that if they were booking all their rent for H2 in Q3 they wouldn't have disclosed that in enormous, jumbo sized letters on this morning's announcement – you know like "We made a $10m EBIT loss but we would have actually made a profit if we didn't expense all our rent in Q3 – or would have provided the EBIT number "normalised" of that peculiar way of treating rent amortisation?
News: MHJ Michael Hill International Says For First 45-Weeks Sales Were Up 4.7%, page-22
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 46 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MHJ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
45.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(1.09%) |
Mkt cap ! $175.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 46.0¢ | 46.0¢ | 45.0¢ | $36.23K | 79.95K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2257 | 44.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 45.5¢ | 706 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MHJ (ASX) Chart |