What you are proposing are all good options to save the day, except that they (the Group) are not listening. It's a sea of red today for a lot of stocks on the market.Volumes of selling are again high makes me think of what people called 'fat-finger dumping' I supposed due to EOFY selling.
On crypto field, there was this guy called Craig Wright, self-proclaiming to be the real creator of Bitcoin and he went to create another coin, called BSV. Most of the people don't really believe him, so he took it to US court, and registered for a copyright of the documentation that he presented bitcoin to the world, and the registering of copyright was like anyone can do so without verification. But what really jerk off were someone threw a weibo post in Chinese said he is the owner of bitcoin (without verification) and a lot of Chinese bought it in. Price shoot up over 100% in 24 hours. But I wouldn't call it a wise choice, nor I would throw any money down to that investment because once, the news settled may it be good or bad, you can either be rich (only if you sell out for money) nor having a screen in front of you, stating you have a certain amount of BSV coins which probably exchange for money of 90% down from what you put in).
What I am saying is people pump or dump based on the news or following that fat-finger dumping right now, but end of the day, you and me are owning proper ownership to machinery, business revenues, real productions what selling direct to the dairy producer to supply to customers. More like sp right now is a part of manipulation of whatever scheme behind the shadow or could just be not enough demand to buy on the market due to global economic threat. But everyone here sort of agree that even if the stock is to be liquidated or solvency, you still get much better pay date than current price of even by the book price of $1.50, people will still accept to the truth than to walk around in this blind alley.
If you think of paranoid, even at one stage, I was thinking, just said, the Group was searching for a CEO, and they have a few candidates on their list, and just happened that UBS had a favorable candidate and the Group turned that fellow down and opt for another one. It happened at many workplaces. And just say, UBS went nut head over this and now they wanted to privatise this company to be the owner of it, to show their fang. I meant, you see Carmen Chua and Sanjay contribution on the news, and I was like cheese, sometimes power can really overcome money.
Initially, on the likedin profile page of Sanjay, he stated that ' he is a self-profitted business mind character' and that is what the Group was looking for. I hope he is what he is. But I meant from the discussion on this thread, I will opt for you (moneymaker1979) to be a CEO because there is at least some verbal attention, than Sanjay though. Look at when Sanjay bought in and Carmen Chua purchasing, price recovered a bit, not because of their contribution but more like the Group is responding to the matter and that's what relief us.
I am desperate for some relief news man!
Expand
(20min delay)