If minority shareholders knew the preceding Case in 2003, they may have voted 'no' for Scheme A, instead of 'yes'. This key and important Case best have made its way into the 400p document that VRL published. It is of relevant substance and for completeness, best have been included in the Scheme Booklet.
For everyones reference, the result of the Case I refer to is a previous attempt by VRL to sell out minority shareholders using their VRC shareholding/influence:
