This sort of reporting really annoys me. The headline and...

This sort of reporting really annoys me. The headline and leading sentence do not match what was said:
WOODSIDE WARNS OF GAS PROJECT DELAY
Woodside Energy has conceded its $16.5bn Scarborough gas development off the West Australian coast faces delays

So what did Meg actually say? (my underlining):
“It is worrying. We are concerned about the uncertainty that the court case has created,”
"So we’re at a point in time now where approvals are not critical path. We intend to keep it that way.”

Okay, so she is using managerial jargon but it's not that hard to understand. So what is the reporter's excuse?