Yes, fair comments as to relative importance in geopolitics. However, holders should consider whether the WDS CEO should accept some of the responsibility for these types of adverse events ie Greenpeace lawsuit. The WDS CEO was a regular media commentator by openly spruiking company credentials on green woke. Now it seems that she may be required to support these claims in another venue. Where is that WDS Chairman on these important company matters? Why don't these company officials stick their knitting, building the business, maximising shareholder returns?
News: WDS Greenpeace Australia files greenwashing lawsuit against Woodside Energy, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 41 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WDS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$26.94 |
Change
0.070(0.26%) |
Mkt cap ! $51.15B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $27.06 | $27.17 | $26.93 | $118.0M | 4.361M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4000 | $26.94 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $26.96 | 1647 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WDS (ASX) Chart |