As expected, the ACCC on 21 March has approved the QIP-XIP merger. This would provide very good confidence with the IPH-XIP deal unlikely to be challenged either when looking at the ACCC's rationale for QIP-XIP:
... the ACCC considered that firms within a merged QANTM and Xenith do not have the incentive to compete with each other. The ACCC concluded that a merged QANTM and Xenith is likely to continue to face competition from a number of alternative large and medium suppliers.
Now that any doubt regarding ACCC is out of the way (I never believed there would be a problem), its simply voting numbers at the next XIP meeting. QIP will lose for reasons I've stated before. IPH may get its numbers quickly from their current 19.9% to 57.7% if the institutions sell. And why wouldn't they, given IPH's financial track record. Any ex-vendor hold out as you've said will start to feel pressure.
The Griffith Hack ex-vendors as a bloc are the largest group of all ex-vendors holding 24.39%. You only have to look at the 2 March 2017 ASX announcement at Annexure A,and figure out which of the 20 Griffith Hack ex-vendors are no longer working and would less reason to vote against the IPH deal. The same process can be repeated for both the 11 Shelston and 9 Watermark ex-vendors also. Then the numbers start to look appealing for IPH. Each ex-vendor has about 350K to 1.1 million XIP shares.
Still a good arb from $1.80 here until the $2 IPH takeover price.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- News: XIP IPH Ltd Requests Xenith Board Defer Date Of Scheme Meeting To Vote On QANTM Merger
As expected, the ACCC on 21 March has approved the QIP-XIP...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add XIP (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online