tony and 86
yes i believe it was rude although i was not a holder
how did the targets response excuse it? i still clearly remember the targets response for roma petroleum when QGC swallowed them for peanuts :
" we have some csg tenements which will require more money to drill and we have some oil and gas which is in tight reservours" - that was the guts of the worst targets response i have seen - those latter oil and gas leases are in same area that vpe and itc and beach are battling over
the csg leases were worth 4 to 5 times the value they got and this was even more obvious a few months later
they still have the hide to say in the statutory section re disclosures that there were no side deals done with directors!!
thx - got to be worth more money hasnt it?
news, page-27
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add OAU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.8¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $57.19M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.8¢ | 0.9¢ | 0.8¢ | $365.0K | 45.36M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 15077150 | 0.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.9¢ | 17703796 | 17 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 18/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| OAU (ASX) Chart |