always wonder if the world will treat the Uranium production...

always wonder if the world will treat the Uranium production like they did on the issue of blood diamonds? where the world took on the ethical side of the equation and reacted to the mining processes and practices and its consequences..

the kazak mining and the Radon saturation in those regions and the high incidents of cancers attributed to radon in those specific mining regions is sort of swept under the carpet.. does that stay that way. will the world perpetually look away?

"Over the past 30 years in East Kazakhstan there was a sharp increase in cancer rates. This growth is particularly noticeable for the Ust-Kamenogorsk city. The increase in total cancer morbidity indicator is mainly due to an increase in the incidence of lung cancer, breast cancer and skin cancer [76].

As mentioned above, the villages where there is a high radon activity, marked by the territory of Kazakhstan, but are characterized by the highest levels of radon East and North Kazakhstan (67 % of settlements in excess). Interestingly, it is in the Eastern and Northern part of the country there is increased (up to 1.5 times or more) the cancer rates, which makes it possible to assume a correlation between radon levels and cancer incidence [76]."

in production of green uranium as nexgen advertises, its also safe to say that the number 1 priority to exclude is exactly what we see in the Kazak regions.

what happens if the tables turn on these regions? as uranium produced energy becomes a big factor in global base load equations and solves a lot of its issues, will the consumers be satisfied with knowing the source of their energy and its consequential health outcomes?