Well Auk, my dear old Dad always said when you find yourself in a holeyou should stop digging.
When it comes to misleading posts, you are no slouch. I have commentedand questioned your posts with respect and civility and now receive antagonismand put-downs for my trouble.
You infer I’m being misleading by (in your words) “(a) referring to previousstatements about ArTiMist, (b) swallowing not applying to adults, (c) class llldrugs and (d) a misattributed Einstein quote”.
Hardly hanging offences even if true however your “quotes” are for themost part misleading in themselves.Nobody cares about this and I don’t blame them, so if you’re bored reading thisjust skip to the next post – I don’t blame you.
(a)referring to previous statements about ArTiMist – my statements were more about the TGA than ArTiMist and, in a nutshell,they were saying that the TGA must think Arti works because they are concernedabout misuse and promoting resistance. That remains my opinion and I stand byit.
It’s based on (among other things) Paul Hopper’s ASX release 4thOctober – and is an opinion.
(b)swallowing not applying to adults– you yourself said “ArTiMist drawsattention to retention time and swallowing in this case due to sickness andchildren. Artemether was absorbed through the upper gastrointestinal tract intothe portal venous system rather than exhibiting the more substantialsublingual absorption as seen in adults.
My comment was – “I realise there was an issue ofchildren swallowing Artimist however my understanding is that it doesn't applyto adults”Any fair-minded person can see I wasn’t being misleading and I think yousecretly know it. I specifically said it was “my understanding” so there was an opening there forwell-intentioned commentary
(c)class lll drugs – breathtaking that you can raise this in the context of me being“misleading”. I am the first to admit that what I know about Class III drugswould fit on the back of a postage stamp along with the Lord’s Prayer.
What I did say was “reading your post and saying we are Class IIIappears to directly contradict this fundamental feature of our product” and Iwent on to request that you and Doole (who appeared to the lay-person to be atodds on this issue) come up with an explanation for us all that you were bothhappy with. I am yet to see such an explanation and don’t really care any more.For you to describe this as misleading is…………..guess what?
(d)a misattributed Einstein quote –
this one takes the cake and I am sure Einstein himself would be pissed off athaving his name dragged into this.
What I said (to you) was “please explain it as if to an eight year old - Iwon't be offended”
I then said (in a separate post) “Einsteinwas supposed to have said “If You Can’t Explain it to a Six Year Old, You Don’tUnderstand it Yourself” but I believe his original quote was just aboutexplaining things simply and I'm with him”.
If you have a problem with that, then you have a problem (full stop)
Next you throw out the barb – “Youdon't understand the safety data sheet” – can you think of a lessaccusatory way of saying that?
You go on to say that “it is referring to 100% anagrelide no oneswallows that” although in the earlier post you used the Anagrelide Safety DataSheet to say that “it may beirritating to the mucous membrane and upper respiratory tract” – so that’s a bit of an each-way bet, isn’t it?
Where does it say that anyway and, especially, referring to the diluted drug?I’m not surprised it might be irritating to the mucous membrane, if you’resupposed to be wearing protective glasses and a lab coat.
I don’t know your intent in thecomment “If you hold shares there is anassumed knowledge.” In my opinion, assumptions are the mother of allf***ups and that comment is an assumption.
There are many, many shareholders in SUDA and, probably, every other company,that know absolutely bugger all about the company’s technology. “Assumedknowledge” is good way of justifying the tendency to want to speak overpeople’s heads.
So, I repeat, if you can’t explainsomething to an 8 year old, you don’t understand it yourself.
And, by the way, I can explain quantum physics to an 8year old – I thought you might have been being unkind with that post but gaveyou the benefit of the doubt and let it go. I shouldn’t have.
(20min delay)
