In answer to your question, you are replying to me because you’ve been caught in a lie. If it were simply a mistake you wouldn’t have dug your heels in and tried all sorts of acrobatics in pursuit of your misleading claim that Next Investors came waltzing along out of nowhere to purchase this stock at 8c per share. Rather, they were engaged on contract to create investor awareness - i.e. promote - and they were given 3.15 million shares to do so.
You have stated:
“...Of course Next Investor purchased their shares” Wrong.
“...You can contact them, they paid with their own money” Wrong.
“...as does Next Investor who bought in at 8 cents” Wrong.
Stubborn and voluminous repetition of a false statement of fact will not make it true. It might make you liable (as S3/Next well knows, hence the sensible disclaimer inclusion admitting potential conflict and bias in all of their published materials) but it still won’t make it true.
You could almost be a conflicted, biased, paid stock promoter yourself were it not for your poor comprehension of all of the above (and your spelling & grammar).
MAN Price at posting:
3.2¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
