One could argue SSkim that those who personalise things when information is kindly provided by others albeit contrary to the other persons own views/hopes, are too emotionally attached and no longer look at things logically?
The point was clearly lost on poor old Rory given his reply regarding the 10,000 Boeing 747's reference by Morgan Stanley. A 690,000 tonne surplus is a 690,000 tonne surplus. Remember the old "which one is heavier, a kilo of feathers or a kilo of lead".
I would urge anyone with a vested interest to at least persuse the article I referred to, you have nothing to lose and all to gain ;)
WC8
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- next jorc
One could argue SSkim that those who personalise things when...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add VAN (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online