Next ship named, page-31

Well I am not AT (thought I would clarify since I am responding first )

Thanks for cross checking the 30 day thing...

Hey... one thing that came to my mind is how they recognize revenue.

It would be good to know if that ship in September was included in the previous Q or not.

I'd be happy if they choose to run with the date of revenue received rather than date that the shipment is loaded.

But then, if they do ship 2 more in December that might sway me... But @Bux436 did point out that after this next one 7,000 tonnes are left of the 2017 pricing.

So if we are going to be shipping 2 ships in December then the first one would need to have some of it at 2018 pricing that hasn't been released.

What a conundrum?!

But a good situation to be in none the less as it requires an announcement.....

Or does it?


I do remember they planned a small shutdown period at Mt Cattlin, forget if I read or heard it on a conference call. - Again from memory it was to improve throughput, though maybe I have that wrong with the mobile crusher and it will be business as usual.