To further clarify. In my previous post where I said 'resource modeling cutoff', I meant resource modeling reporting cutoff. This discussion is about what cutoff they use for Jorc resource reporting not what they use for modeling ore/waste contacts (kings point). 0.2g/t may be appropriate as an modeling cutoff (determined by geo) but shouldn't be reported. In fact, at Old Pirate it might be appropriate to model with 0g/t cutoff and use the quartz veins as the ore/waste boundary given the high nugget there - as long as the high grades are well controlled in the estimation. However it should be officially reported at a higher cutoff (eg mill break-even, incremental reserve) to demonstrate 'some' likelihood of the resource being economic, not at 0g/t, not at 0.2g/t.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PRX
- next week
next week, page-10
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 33 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PRX (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.235M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 4204859 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.3¢ | 25026753 | 26 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 4204859 | 0.002 |
28 | 75764704 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.003 | 25026753 | 26 |
0.004 | 9428666 | 12 |
0.005 | 4895870 | 8 |
0.006 | 2966667 | 6 |
0.007 | 7600000 | 3 |
Last trade - 11.31am 12/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
PRX (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable