If any geos or anyone else for that matter answer or help with the following. If ni:cr ratios can be proxies of Mgo levels what is the significance of descending ni:cr ratio while Mgo increased.
"A clear correlation was demonstrated between areas of stronger near-surface secondary Ni enrichment and areas in fresh rock with higher Ni levels. This was highlighted in CAMRC-011, which is in the area with the highest geochemical soil value for Ni. CAMRC-011 also showed a descending Ni:Cr ratio at depth while the MgO values increased at depth.
"
Thanks
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
7.4¢ |
Change
0.009(13.9%) |
Mkt cap ! $216.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 6.5¢ | 7.5¢ | 6.5¢ | $2.608M | 36.76M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 130000 | 7.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 7.4¢ | 1894049 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.14pm 12/09/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SGQ (ASX) Chart |