I know IGV isn't worth too much on its own. However for a miner...

I know IGV isn't worth too much on its own. However for a miner that can economically extract resources, 1% IGV to MC seems to be a number that few people could argue with.

So, just as a ball park Market Cap figure that makes sense to me without (hopefully) being a blue-skies ramper, 1% of $200B is there or thereabouts IMHO as a decent and probable MC in the future. Pick your timeframe.

This is based on the premise that Nickel does in fact continue to rise, Cobalt doesn't tank (<50%, how can it?), and that we find and can utilise the other useful minerals amongst the Nickel-Cobalt we mine.

And our gold, spun off or not, must add a little more to that also.