1. BIT announced the results. 2. BIT never stated they would...

1. BIT announced the results.

2. BIT never stated they would disclose all the relating scientific data.

3. Your definition of "results" has no baring on this, but it's certainly driving your opinion.

You either believe there was a "significant immunological effect" or you don't...
You either believe that effect is worth something or not...

Nothing is known yet... other than BIT have told us what they are prioritizing and what they objectives are - Based of the results the have annouced to the market.

So you either believe in BIT or you don't....

If you don't believe in BIT, fair enough.... but you've got zero evidence to suggest they are doing the opposite of what is stated.

So that's how I know you're making things up.
You're just guessing.