cool your jets fella. ask the company maybe? dunno. I'm not...

cool your jets fella. ask the company maybe? dunno. I'm not sure if anyone on these threads knows why. you could speculate that paperwork happens at different rates, who knows. I seem to recall one of the pnn tenements came with mining permissions or some level of approvals perhaps more advanced than those of sum tenements. go back and read the aquisition Ann.. pnn is a vastly more diverse company (at present and promise) than sum, I'd hazard that half the holders here are probably worried the niobium/tantalum exploration play is a mere distraction from core lithium focus, and other development priorities. not interested in a comparison of which is better, holders are smart enough to make those decisions for themselves.
regarding directorships and broker bedfellows, mate it's the swampy end of the asx, so you have to grin and bear it. but when you see companies dishing out millions of long dated options largely in lieu of cash, to brokers and corporate partners per the announcements today, you just have to assume that there is a plan in place.
not sure what your motives are, please respect that we haven't attempted to draw comparison or spark rivalry. in many ways the companies successes or failures with the drill are linked. in many ways it could be advantageous to learn from neighbouring drilling?