So you confirmed that you agree that discrimination is appropriate for those with COVID as they present a higher health risk.
Those who are unvaccinated are also a higher health risk, particularly for those for whom vaccination is not effective or are unable to be vaccinated as immuno-compromised. Thus, there should be restrictions on the unvaccinated.
Given your agreement to the first point, are you not being hypocritical is not agreeing with the second
- Forums
- Political Debate
- No jab no welfare
No jab no welfare, page-285
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 230 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)