The $20M settlement was beyond comprehension. To settle for pittance and a loss, there must either be some movements in swiss bank accounts or some idiots had jeopardised the case with their incompetence when opening their mouth. When you read the various BTA statements/announcements they sound intteligent but when you analyse them you begin to see how hollow they are. Blaming Peter Molloy and stating the poor Relenza royalty reflected off season northern hemisphere must rate as a Peter Classic.
If you look at my post years ago, eventhough I did not reflect uninhibited exuberance (DMA where are you?), on the legal case I was cautiously optimistic. Events that happened justified our optimism - GSK would never have offerred $100M + costs had it not been a strong case.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BTA
- no one trusts or believes you peter
no one trusts or believes you peter, page-57
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)