You accept blog site info as fact. Yet you have not produced any information that suggests the weather stations you have selected have been picked as a statistically random sample, nor that they are a representative selection of the affects of homogenisation.
There are no supporting links for your bogus information, no referenced scientific papers. In short, as far as we can tell you have made them up.
Yet when we have provided you with Bureau of Meteorology studies that detail the processes they use and show that, overall, homogenisation has reduced the warming trend, not enhanced it, your critical response is what? "Don't buy it".
Whether you do this out of ignorance or purpose, you are selling nothing but denial, conspiracy theory and unsubstantiated, repetitive drivel.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- No pause, 2014 hot as
No pause, 2014 hot as, page-106
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
3DA
AMAERO INTERNATIONAL LTD
Hank Holland, Executive Chairman and CEO
Hank Holland
Executive Chairman and CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online