Let the pretty girl educate you while exposing the scam, and how it is achieved which she falls for herself.
The scam is in the peer reviewed adjustments which only a few at the top are in control of.
Note how she talks about legitimate reasons for adjustments while never mentioning say the reasons for adjusting down the 1930s data at all. This despite a quite radical change which gives the temperature graph its tilt. Without that change there is no rise in the temperature graph of course. Same goes for the medieval waring they had to 'get rid of as it was a problem for their desired outcome as exposed in the Climategate emails by those in control of the peer review process.
Note that Mann's hockey stick data remains unchecked and unverified to this day.
