The Climategate emails exposed the planned end point desired.
We have quotes like 'we will all have to decide how dishonest to be' for instance.
So have a think about how this presents in actual practise after that point keeping in mind people don't want to risk jail generally.
One way is adjusting the data and having arguments to support those adjustments - this is for you @NevBhc. The arguments don't need to be correct just appear to be plausible or arguable. The truth does not matter just what is perceived to be the truth as the quote says.
Another is not allowing anyone to check what you did with various arguments ( that are not the scientific method ) like too hard or too much work or I need permission to share the data like Mann. Again this is for you @NevBhc.
Another is being the top few in place that are in charge of peer review and what does and does not get published. In this way the narrative can be controlled and the thousands f honest scientists doing their jobs properly can be kept in the dark. Any that question things get their funding stopped.
This is why this is an IQ thing. The easily fooled and the too busy with life to follow things properly remain in the dark.
Conferences on boiling temperatures getting cancelled due to snowstorms turns the lights on for a few that they are been given a snow job.
Some suggest that it is all part of a managed decline. Add in female vote and feminism to manage a population decline and add in lowered teaching levels in schools and lowered testosterone levels to make the men weak and pliable as well if you like. Enjoy your serfdom.
