Einstein. lolYou going on about circular logic again. LOL you idiot. Your world is engulfed in it mate.
Anyway stick to science. You don’t see that mainstream thermodynamics is built on circulatory science. It defines temperature statistically, then uses constants measured from thermal behavior to reinforce that same framework. That’s what’s circularity is. Are you blind to that mate!
Millikan’s work, however, wasn’t circular—it was first principles. He used electric fields to provide a force on charged particles or oil droplets carrying electrons to counteract gravity. He knew that electric fields created forces on electrons that we now know as being on electron clouds.
Molecules such as CO2, N2 and O2 though non-polar, are temporarily polarized under field influence or via collisions. This exerts a force on them — a reality mainstream climate science often neglects in energy-transfer modeling. While Millikan didn’t study O2 or CO2 directly, his experiment showed how electric fields exert measurable forces on small charged particles laying the foundation for broader field-based interpretations.
Millikan didn’t guess at random gas behavior.
He quantified it from the ground up.By measuring the force on a single electron in a known electric field, he established the value of one electron volt. The work done moving one electron through one volt of potential.That precise electrodynamic measurement of “e” allowed the calculation of Avogadro’s number Na from electrostatic principles. Once Na was known, the Boltzmann constant kB followed deterministically, not statistically.He didn’t derive kB by watching gas volumes in a flask. He built a lab experiment grounded in force equilibrium and field interaction. That’s called working from first principles.Ouch. That must hurt, hey?
So what I’m doing is continuing that path for me. I have already discovered that Earths temperature can be derived from the electron volt at 1 Bar. So to can Venus.So that is linking temperature, energy, and pressure back to electrodynamic interactions, not abstract averages.
If you want to challenge that, then fine. Dont me a ignorant mug in that process. Stop being a loser and have a go.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- NO such thing as Climate Change?