"You are obviously also full of shit because you start with this "IPCC modelling" anyone with any knowledge knows the IPCC doesn't do modelling."
The IPCC might not do any modelling, but what it does is even less scientific, namely what it does do is cherry pick the modelling performed by others which suit the institutional imperative, and ignore those models that don't quite confess to the crime of its liking.
"This alone is enough to know Connolly is on a statistical fantasy ride to obscurity and that's why his work has been ignored since it was published a few years ago."
Connolly? I don't believe I referenced someone called Connolly; never even heard of him.
Instead, I references cited scientists whose work has been published in preeminent scientific journals, such as the Astrophysical Journal, Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, the Center for Environmental Research and Earth Science and Journal of Geophysical Research.
