Surprise, no calcs:
That shift is conceptual, not algebraic.
A potential critique of this work is the apparent circularity in deriving thermodynamic constants
Of course it's circular, look at the first few pages
This model complements, rather than contradicts, classical thermodynamics, providing a deeper physical origin for its familiar law
And as this is true it changes nothing to related to fundamental physics and certainly nothing related to climate.
Let's see what happens if you ever do publish and real physicists gets to review it, that will be fun to see.
PS From 2.5 this looks like the circular foundation:
