NO such thing as Climate Change?, page-15545

  1. 14,542 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 886
    Now you are just being a mindless automaton....

    Repeatting faulty assumptions over and over does not make them valid.

    The Sun's effect has been magnified by less cloud cover. Capiche?

    That makes the quoted paragraph >

    "Scientists know of no natural changes to the equilibrium between the amount of solar radiation absorbed by Earth and the amount of energy radiated back to space that can account for such a rapid period of global warming. The amount of incoming solar radiation has increased only slightly over the past century and is therefore not a driver of Earth’s current climate warming."

    totally redundant and simply wrong. The latest peer reviewed science means that scientists now know what the accelerant is. The Sun and cloud cover reduction.

    Its that simple.

    Please engage your brain and interpret what you quote before you spam it.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.