The application of the adiabatic lapse rate and latent heat clearly explain the Earths temperature.
You ask these guys to refute the Adiabatic lapse rate and latent heat and Insert GHG Back radiation theory THEY CANNOT.
It is a simple concept. CO2 Back radiation versus adiabatic lapse rate and latent heat.
They cannot have both. Pick one or the other.
The application of the adiabatic lapse rate and latent heat...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 858 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)