"I have an understanding of how the scientific process works.". ... oh is that right.... so why then do you ignore the observations by science?
modelling is the item thats only an educated guess, not predictions. taking modelled results as concrete predictions is the flaw of the anti-science mob. its a false argument used against the actual science. its deliberate disinformation (by legal definition).
how many times have we had this discussion zip? yet you continue with the same old furphy argument.
NO such thing as Climate Change?, page-30
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3,112 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)