Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

RAP

Click for more information

0.00%

20.5¢ raptor resources limited

No-vote letter update, page-114

Currently unlisted. Proposed listing date: 4 SEPTEMBER 2024 #

First 114 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
wagyl

60 Posts.

30/07/22

20:12

Post #: 62832448
Share

Originally posted by kidajh ↑

So with all due respect to TT now let's unpack his post and reveal it for the piece of crap that it is. Picture him penning his letter with a pfizer lawyer standing behind him with a gun at his head, metaphorically speaking of course.
Pt1. ...Significant headwind ...existing relationships are not translating into positive cashflow...
-pfizer is the head wind, having created a distraction for the last 6 months. We are at the beginning of doing multiple deals with telehealth companies not just one or two. it will be the cumulative earnings from multiple telehealth companies that make wrap a viable financial concern. We are coming out of the northern hemisphere summer so of course figures would be subdued. Medgate is extending the use of DX. Alodokter and Ilara health figures were not mentioned and this creates a false perception.
.2 the company has not been able to announce any significant improvement in tweaking the covid-19 algorithm...
- since when has rap given us blow-by-blow descriptions of the development of it's algorithms. For you TT to make such a statement suggests management is in your ear telling you what to write. The algorithm can be tweaked and the algorithm is in the process of being tweeked successfully or pfizer would have pulled the plug on this deal so cut the bulshit. So what if they have to adjust the algorithm each time covid variegates. That's their business so just do it. Do you think a pharmaceutical company shirks it's business of creating a new vaccine just because there is a new flu virus every year. They don't resign themselves and say oh well another flu virus we can't keep up with this.
Pt 3 who said there are going to be resignations of key personnel? Before your backflip you sent me an email asking me my thoughts on the composition of the board of rap should a no vote prevail. I told you I would not support a leadership spill because once pfizer is relegated to it's position of a licenced customer I don't think a scenario like this merger proposal will be entertained again and management can and will just get on with the business of developing the business. But one last reflection on this point: no one in the business world is irreplaceable.
Pt4 Abou your research into potential cornerstone investors. My my how well researched you make yourself sound. Are you for real even putting this statement in your post. Oh so you have called all the institutional investors and potential suitors around the world and picked their brains and they have been quite forthcoming to you about their future strategies. Yeah I highly doubt it.
Pt5 then you make a whole lot of blah blah comments about the composition of the shareholder register and finish it off with a statement rap management is probably no longer able to fulfil the vision we all had. Wow the powers-that-be must have a tight squeeze on your goolies.
Claptrap and obfuscation. ResApp management was absolutely in the process of fulfilling the vision and is even now in the process of fulfilling the vision. Just read over the plethora of announcements prior to April this year.
There is one simple fact. Nothing has changed. The trajectory of rap is great. It's just a matter of in whose hands its ownership is held in the future.

We anticipated more broadsides. We didn't know what shape or form they would take but your post TT is just another one of them. Sad but understandable how you were taken hostage.
People: Vote NO and our armour will remain impenetrable.
All in my opinion which is not very humble and all on the back of other people's research.

Expand

I think you make some very good points Kidajh,thanks.
In the past few days I have had three different body's call me seeking info about how and reasons why I will be voting this way. To me it seems extremely unlikely this amount of interest in the vote generated from a Pfizer that will just walk away after a no vote and not increase their bid for round two and three if needed, we need to be patient. Our benevolent directors have given Pfizer the upper hand in this transaction at every point they could, so we must stand up to them ourselves, vote hell no.

In any deal I've ever been involved in the number one rule is never offer your top price first. Pfizer are like BHP in a way, they don't go around buying companies that will return them millions of dollars they are only interested in the unicorns, and they aren't here not to buy because of loose change. Make em pay.

RAP Price at posting: 11.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
24 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Emerald & Azure score Digger & Dealer awards

EQR

EQ Resources transitions historic Mt Carbine tungsten mine to owner-operator system

VTM

Victory Metals dips -8% even as company set to grow heavy REE resource at North Stanmore

M2R

EIS co-funded campaign sees Miramar kick off maiden drilling at Bangemall, Gascoyne WA

ARD

Argent begins search for VMS mineralisation at Kempfield Cu-Pb-Zn-Au-Ag play in NSW

Bitcoin: Current State of Play & Where to Next | Swyftx

Week 33 Wrap: US recession fears forgotten; RBNZ’s surprise rate cut; more iron ore trouble

IMD

IMDEX to receive $10M in out-of-court settlement with Boart Longyear over downhole tool patent

SVL

Court of Appeal upholds environmental group's challenge to Silver Mines Ltd's Bowden project

WNX

Wellnex sees first special access scheme prescriptions for new Wellness Life brand

There are more pages in this discussion • 172 more messages in this thread...

First 114 Last

Add RAP (ASX) to my watchlist