NO-Vote support statement - draft 2, page-14

"The first bullet point should contain Alodokters name" - absolutely! I can't believe I omitted it! That will definitely be there in the next draft.

Regarding the ethical credentials, I considered including the Gates Foundation and the shelved discussions with MSF. In the end I opted for practical, concrete examples rather than intentions or possibilities.

I'm not sure myself whether to go with "we encourage" or "I encourage". Speaking as a group has more force but is less personally engaging. That's why the letter kind of flips between individual/personal and group/consensus. That indecision also lead me to phrase some of the sentences in passive form: "there is enormous potential". I think this is kind of weak. It would read much better as "we (or I) see enormous potential". I'd love to see a lot more discussion on this topic.