Yes that was aimed at you. With respect ( and I do respect you)...

Yes that was aimed at you.

With respect ( and I do respect you) as I consider you to be a sensible person, not given to OCD behavoiur.

But with respect you do appear to be adopting the wrong criteria for selecting and retaining a director.

5 years is long enough to give solid public support, But once that trust is destroyed watch out!

Do the job properly and you can stay for 50 years.

BUT do not take a position that is contrary to what was said in October 2016 and then in March and May 2017, and then please don't insult the shareholders intelligence , by then stating, "we are on the cusp of success"

Which is the correct, March and May 2017 or the July 2017 comments

Please, we only live for so long and only have limited time to make any money we would like to make.

Why should shareholders continue to place themselves in a position where trust and confidence has been lost and the only real opportunity to make changes is soon to evaporate later this year.



CB