what about the lithium projects they acquired when I was still a...

First 13 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Trade4Profit88

9,569 Posts.

604

04/02/24

21:08

Post #: 72231106
Share

Originally posted by Nowhere Man: ↑

Ah, T4P.

Of course people are here to make profit (though your own motivation for so long haunting the G88 threads as such a volubly negative non-holder is something of a mystery), and I am the first to admit that this is a counter-cyclical play.

However, folks of my bent, with a 'fundamentals' or 'value' approach are typically guided by empirical evidence - studies, research, 'the data' - in weighing the risk/reward equation.

It's no different here, though I am happy to be only one voice among a spectrum of views.

However, I suppose I should reveal that, like Rockjumper, I made quite a tidy sum from the initial run-up of G88 on the back of the discovery of Quicksilver.

Revisiting the story several years later, and perhaps better understanding the positive implications of the metallurgical testwork (and its credentials - particularly as guided by Brian McNab), I am possibly more tolerant of reversals than others.

In any case, I do think that Quicksilver is continuing to shape as a humdinger - and I think our key personnel are second to none as likely to successfully pull it off.

Expand

what about the lithium projects they acquired when I was still a holder?

when was last time we hear anything from any of the lithium projects?
CR for lithium acquisition
REO failed to raise money then
REE potential at QS then CR

and most recent gold potential at QS then

G88 Price at posting: 1.2¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply