re: jc ~ not all scum like yak methinks -- bob ? mitsoss,
Maybe you never studied basic logic, but a basic tenet is that facts need to have a pertinent relationship to bear on one another. Deeds by Arafat are not pertinent to deeds by Sharon unless both Arafat and Sharon were involved in the fact at hand.
Someone says Sharon did this - you say Arafat did that, as if Arafat's deed has some bearing on Sharon's deed. There's no relationship at all dummy.
An analogy is a murderer whose defence is - I'm not the only murderer. Do you buy that? No?
- Forums
- General
- not all scum like yak methinks
not all scum like yak methinks, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
ACW
ACTINOGEN MEDICAL LIMITED
Will Souter, CFO
Will Souter
CFO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online