Not all secondary deposits are the same, page-119

First 119 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
rastus64

9,119 Posts.

126

30/10/17

22:40

Post #: 28331775
Share

Originally posted by TwinTurboCelica ↑

Seriously, who quotes grades including overburden? What is this, mining amateur hour?

Just to recap, you have company that...

* Dug for Diamonds they can't sell.
* Talk about production/revenue etc without a JORC
* Have specials that apparently aren't of "material value"
* Have 6 months until unknown $$ from sales, and have quarterly cash burn that will not last 6 months but apparently don't to raise capital
* Compare their deposits to their neighbour, but use a different calculation on the grade.... because?
* Have not yet developed a method for knowing what there mind product is worth
* Apparently they know the grade/size of the specials but they are not willing to release this information.

At what point does any of the above raise alarm bells?

I'm happy to be advised otherwise, but it would appear to me that there is the possibility of at least 1 breach of ASX rules in the above list.

Look... maybe they will find better deposits, maybe they will have an awesome profitable mine, maybe I'm a random nutter....

Do yourself a favour and at least take this on board, take the blinkers off... understand the risks... don't bet the house.

Expand

I don't think betting the house was the problem. Not taking profit and greed is the trouble maker that is going to haunt some guys for awhile thinking about what could have been.

MUS Price at posting: 10.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Not Held
2 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

CNB

Carnaby Resources hits copper at Mohawk, QLD

RMX

Red Mountain Mining: record gold prices, two projects, two greenstone belts

CBL

Control Bionics expands into UK and Irish markets with NeuroNode device

GDC

Global Data Centres not clear on future operations after AirTrunk sale payout

YAL

Yancoal makes it into the ASX200 in latest S&P rebalance