not enough plantations to pulp

How many hectares are there to supply the pulp mill to meet its commitment NOT to use old growth and native forests.?

Again the logistical transportation,is there not a relucutance on the viability on Gunns part to transport the plantation trees fron Kangaroo ISland.?

Book values of Gunns are based on what?-current assets of a pulp mill?--what pulp mill?,

Tree plantations that investors have,did not meet the expectations in GTP,and there was enough indicators by GTP management to see that.In fact GTP's ponzi scheme used its own company tree lots to load up a year's harvest so as people would not gerry that it was falling down in harvest quantities

Why would Gunns not do the same?,under another entity that has rounded up 30% stake in the tree schemes directly ,what's to stop Gunns doing that---that is shifty .?

That entity is the ANZ bank.

Gunns IMO will not meet the required ecologicl and price that as investor I should get.At present Gunns have shown that they can't meet the Great Southern Plantations requirements and that the first notice that we, the investor have to pay the insurance on tree lots that have no assessment let alone are still there.

Further to not meeting its requirements financially,does not in the Agri bussiness in Tasmania that if you do not make a profit on the farm the state government financially penalises you under their quaint land laws,its hang over from Oliver Cromwell days,

All these advisory companies that were touting Gunns must have egg on there faces.If they have egg,imagine what it is on the dumb investors faces that invested in these,tree scams