Not for Lease, page-28

You miss the obvious points because you see my post as a personal attack on you, which is quite wrong. You do not ask me to explain my position or reasoning. This is the reason I don’t write much here.

Anyone who has anything to do with the listing rules knows that quoting in-situ mineralisation value is a ‘no go’.

I told you about FMG because it puts the claim of $10 billion into perspective and expected the readers to think and make deductions as a consequence.

I did not like a misplaced and incorrect comment of yours and gently retaliated, so what do you do Mr Jzed? You feign offence and liken me to overcooked pasta… without salt no less.

Without salt!