Hi TCG,
"Do you think if they had had a bumper 1/4 as 1/2 of you are suggesting, they would have required a further $750k?"
If you read the ann. properly, it states that they have terminated the agreement with Gesaf, therefore they will probably need to give Gesaf back their 750K. Hence the need for the extra 750K.
That's how I read it anyway.
Cheers,
TT
Hi TCG,"Do you think if they had had a bumper 1/4 as 1/2 of you...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add TEE (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
10.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.138M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 10.5¢ | 10.5¢ | 10.5¢ | $2.883K | 27.45K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 143115 | 10.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0¢ | 30000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.58pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| TEE (ASX) Chart |