I agree. If the Stanwell deal is so great and Petherbridges analysis so wrong, then why not let us shareholders judge for ourselves? Its our company, not Ray James and Ray McNamara and whoever that other fellow is.
Whats wrong with a little transparency here?
Or will the Stanwell deal turn out to be just the same as the last 'great' deal the Board/Occam tried to foist on us - Pacific Capital's 'toxic' convertible notes.
Incidentally there was an even more damning article by Chew Xiang, the Singaporean financial journalist in July 2008 about Pacific Capital. Somehow the Board didn't read that one either.
I agree. If the Stanwell deal is so great and Petherbridges...
Add ICN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.608M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
| ICN (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable