You raise some good points. Let us all not forget recent history at this AGM.
As the board so eloquently made clear several times, some members have only been in the role mere months so it is essentially a new board. My view is we need some tangible results, not necessarily massive but results nonetheless prior to us being able to approve remuneration changes.
I believe in competitive remuneration as well as additional remuneration for results. I think we need to remind the board of the exceedingly poor outcomes for shareholders due to previous board incentives not being equally aligned for shareholders. Sure, that was the old board (mostly) however the current outlook and wariness of share holders is a direct result of that.
Many of us here have holdings well in excess of several million, that, if necessary could collectively wield some clout to "align" our interests. I think this board is smart enough to not wake the sleeping giant....lest they create a great disturbance in the force.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- notice of agm and explanatory statement
You raise some good points. Let us all not forget recent history...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 93 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable