A lot don't understand that with the subtle change of one word, the stats can be stretched wildly in the way certain agenda wants to home in the fear.
Vaccines all along is supposed to prevent illness from immunisation. Did people take polio, cholera or any other global administered vaccines simply to prevent hospitalisations? Let's be clear, mRNA delivery is not how vaccine delivery the antibody, a scientific fact. All authorities globally refer it as such because it would be perceived as experimental alternate delivery mechanism. How did that narrative morphed to now a hospitalisation prevention? Booster means the efficacy is failing fast. Any studies on booster efficacy?
We have a new strain South African B.. will mRNA the C19 solution fight this new strain? Booster was Delta's answer because we had to use existing tech, I guess subject to newer version Booster will reapply regardless.
In order for authorities to demonstrate confidence in these vaccines, why not remove the indemnity clause against the makers? I already know the answer to this simple Q, to stop any exploitation from ambulance chasers and profiteering by individual's imagination.
