Now...the left will allow a woman to sell her baby. How distasteful., page-4

First 4 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
spinefx

9,073 Posts.

1064

17/06/24

09:17

Post #: 74344476
Share

Originally posted by hersuit ↑

Dont think its a transactional action
The Agency vets the couple and places the baby in a home that will meet its needs
A far cry from selling to the highest bidder

Surrogacy platforms at least vet the folks unlike these POS gay monsters
oppins;font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-weight:400;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);">Background checks exist in the adoption process to protect children from being placed in dangerous homes.oppins;font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-weight:400;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);">
In a recent case, Adam Stafford King was arrested this year for allegedly planning to sexually abuse the baby boy he and his partner were expecting via surrogate. Background checks that are not required in surrogacy could have stopped Mark Newton and Peter Truong from sexually abusing a boy they paid a Russian woman to carry in 2005. Police believe they wanted to have a child “for the sole purpose of exploitation.”

The boy’s abuse began just days after he was born and video shows Newton abusing him less than two weeks after his birth.

The men traveled the world for more than six years, selling the boy for sex with at least eight men, recording the abuse, and uploading the footage to the “Boy Lovers Network.”

Expand

H,

Sure these terrible situations can occur, as I'm sure you are aware they do with adoptions also,

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/netflixs-asunta-case-true-story-141051208.html
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

From the Floor with Kim Beazley at Diggers and Dealers 2024

From the Floor with Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton at Diggers & Dealers 2024

Astute sniffs 1,260 ppm lithium and thick mineralisation in Nevada

Revolutionary inverter technology leads the clean energy charge

Largest drill campaign to begin: Saturn Metals at Diggers & Dealers